Fintech company
200 cases automated
An existing QA team cleared its automation backlog in a few months. Regression went from one week to two days.
- Existing cases automated
- 200
- Identified backlog completed
- 100%
- Previous regression
- 1 week
- Regression after automation
- 2 days
The starting problem
A QA team supporting a complex fintech product had test cases ready but no time to automate them. The backlog had reached 200 cases, while regression consumed a week.
What changed
- Used the 200 existing cases as the defined automation backlog.
- Automated the entire identified backlog over a few months.
- Enabled those cases to run automatically while the QA team continued supporting product delivery.
“Once the 200 pending cases were automated, regression stopped consuming a full week and completed in two days, even across a complex project.”
Project outcome summary
Scope of the result
100% refers to the 200 cases in the identified backlog, not 100% of the product. The regression figures are the reported before-and-after duration for this project; a separate effort-hours breakdown is not published.
The backlog was completed in a few months. Exact dates and pipeline configuration have not been published.
What to take from this case
A defined backlog gives an automation engagement a concrete scope and a clear completion target.
These are project-specific outcomes, not forecasts for a new engagement. Your baseline and acceptance criteria are agreed separately.
Explore the serviceDefine your first step.
A free 30-minute conversation about your testing needs. A formal audit is a separate engagement.