Travel and flight booking
3 days to 2 hours
Module-wide automation replaced a fully manual regression process, freeing QA to focus on new features.
- Previous regression
- 3 days
- Automated regression
- 2 hours
- Scope of coverage
- All modules
- And before each release
- Daily
The starting problem
Regression testing at a travel and flight-booking company was entirely manual. Each regression cycle took three days, occupying the QA team while new features also needed attention.
What changed
- Built regression coverage across the application's modules.
- Connected pipelines to run daily and before each release.
- Moved repeatable regression checks into automation so manual QA could focus on new features.
“Regression no longer consumed three days of the QA cycle. It ran automatically in two hours, giving the team more time to test new features.”
Project outcome summary
Scope of the result
The before-and-after figures describe the project's reported regression duration. Module-wide coverage does not mean every possible behavior was tested. A separate breakdown of human effort and execution time is not published.
The implementation period has not been published.
What to take from this case
Automating an established regression process can create room for exploratory testing and new-feature work.
These are project-specific outcomes, not forecasts for a new engagement. Your baseline and acceptance criteria are agreed separately.
Explore the serviceDefine your first step.
A free 30-minute conversation about your testing needs. A formal audit is a separate engagement.